The FOSS community has a great way to explain what they mean by free...
"Free as in beer" or "Free as in speech" helps differentiate between different meanings of the word "free".
Many keep on calling communist healthcare "free healthcare". Presumably because they have failed economics.
In many senses such a healthcare system is free... "free" as in "Free People's Democratic Republic of ..."; we have all noticed how tyrannical authoritarian governments refer to themselves with such adjectives. And the healthcare "reform" that was actually passed here in the united states is no exception. Rather then believing in the rhetoric that everyone who opposes it is a rich old white man who wants those less fortunate to die due to lack of treatment, perhaps you should consider listening to both sides with an open mind.
The liberals paint a very appealing emotional explanation as to why this would be the greatest thing, how it would save lives, and how anyone who opposes it is evil, rich, and a bigot.
But if you dare only listen with an open mind to a conservative you would find out that our critiques focus on the actual "reform" being a bunch of empty promises, how they would specifically harm healthcare with ham-fisted approach that solves nothing, how there are real solutions (such as portability between jobs and state lines) which the bill does not include. The promise of communism is very rosy... everything is free, everything is taken care of, and there is no "waste" of "profiteering". But the reality is that we are looking at a decline.
How well has communist healthcare worked in the united states before?
The government runs medicare, medicaid, and veterans care. All three of which are deep in debt, highly inefficient, and decline MORE care then any private insurance, with the worst private insurance still providing twice the actual care of medicare.
The government of Massachusetts has taken over the healthcare market there years ago, and what was the result? The healthcare market in MA is 95% non profit organizations... as a direct result of the government MANDATING pricing and policies all are going bankrupt. They have all stopped selling policies... if you live in MA then you can NOT buy healthcare. They are throwing open their books to the public and showing exactly how they will go bankrupt. But the current governor promised in his election that prices will not rise, and last I check was threatening administrators of those companies with fines or more if they do not resume sale of policies and REDUCE prices even further.
And what of countries such as canada? there you have strict rationing. Where the richest go to private clinics and pay an arm and a leg, and the middle class and the poor simply do not receive the care they need.
And what of countries like china? or the USSR in its time? those were certainly not nice places to get sick in.
So yes, "free healthcare" is a perfect description for it, as long as you qualify it with "free" as in "Free People's Democratic Republic of ..."