Speaking up against our would be soviet overlords.
Nationalize all industry, rig the elections.
Published on August 10, 2012 By taltamir In Politics

http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=2510250&spid=32346

Yesterday in two separate speeches obama said he wants to and is going to nationalize ALL manufacturing industry in america.

I highly recommend all to listen to the mark levin August 9, 2012 show. Or at least just follow the links to the excerpts from obama's speeches.

It is critical to keep in mind that he has already nationalized much of the auto industry, student loans, and has started the nationalization process of the healthcare industry.

The issue with Obama Healthcare destroying bill is not that it illegally nationalizes industry (that comes later). Instead they created a mandate where the government designs a product (a healthcare plan of their design) which private companies must offer (and may not offer competing products not designed by the government). And makes it a ILLEGAL for you to NOT purchase said product. If you do not purchase it you are fined. Way back in the day I recall seeing video clips from congress where democrats such as harry reid stated that this will lead to single payer nationalized healthcare by bankrupting private insurance companies so the government could sweep in with a replacement; saving the day.

The 5 activists on the supreme court declared that the government MAY indeed fine you for not purchasing a product if they so deem it, as doing so is a tax... When asked what KIND of tax (as only 3 typed are allowed by the constitution AND the 3 kinds are all implemented in completely different manners) the chief justice refused to answer saying "do not get hung up on labels". Kudos to activist judge Kennedy for siding with the 3 real judges this time, as apparently his activism doesn't extend this far into total tyranny.

Furthermore, in recent months Obama has ORDERED police, border patrol, and lawyers to NOT arrest or persecute illegal immigrants. Violent criminals are being released back to the street if they are illegal immigrants for crimes people here legally go to jail for. Caught crossing the border in a boat full of illegals and heroin traces (indicating drugs were quickly dumped overboard?) released due to persecutors refusing to persecute and ordering the border patrol agents to release all the people involved. Caught beating your wife? released for being an illegal immigrant... sorry, a "dreamer". This is an impeachable offense for a US president but the democrat senate is protecting him for it... or all the other impeachable offenses obama, the first one I listed was the firing of the inspector general as mentioned in my very first ever article in this blog.

In an effort to steal the election, state's attempts to curtail voter fraud by verifying voters are citizens, human, alive, and only voting once are being opposed as "racist" and deemed illegal by the Obama administration and the courts.

The supreme court with its 5 to 4 liberal majority upheld the nationalization of healthcare as constitutional by rewriting as a tax... yet saying its not a tax for the purpose of constitutionality in another of the arguments against it. AND they struck down arizona's attempt to enforce immigration laws.

So where does it leave us? Refusal to enforce laws, gutting the constitutions and our legal rights, concerted efforts to steal the election with voter fraud, and intent to fully nationalize ALL industry in the country!

This reminds me of the very first two articles I ever wrote on July 1, 2009:

http://soviet-overlords.joeuser.com/article/358153/Forshadowing

 
Is this foreshadowing? If Obama wins this election thanks to the voter fraud he is enabling, will he follow the exact same path the president of Honduras did and turn us into a communist dictatorship? All signs point to the answer being yes.

Comments
on Aug 10, 2012

reserved

on Aug 10, 2012

Unfortunately, such a scenario is becoming more & more plausible with each passing week.

on Aug 11, 2012

As a UK citizen it saddens me that the level of American political dialog has on both the left and the right is fast disappearing off any form of reasoned rational argument and instead focused on wild mis-characterisations, 

The above diatribe is yet another example of an utterly deranged rant that completely ignores any reference to any facts and makes an argument based on self fulfilling beliefs. There are many things in the post that are simply wrong mostly WILDLY wrong and even the most biased fact check site would point them out as fantasy land. 

For example the current US supreme court has 5 Justices who are conservative and 4 liberal. NOT 5 liberals and 4 conservatives. The Chief Justice could never seriously be described by any sane and rational individual as an "activist judge". 

Indeed in the Healthcare rant above the poster doesn't even have the first clue about what it proposed. eg: "private companies" "may not offer competing products not designed by the government" that is completely and utterly false, private companies can and will design any form of insurance policy they like, then again when you are mid rant why let the truth stand in the way and spoil your argument?

On Voter Fraud, the estimate of voter ID fraud in 2004 was of the order of 0.0004% a vanishingly small problem. (http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/policy_brief_on_the_truth_about_voter_fraud/) The estimate of absentee ballot fraud is of the order of 2-3% ie: for every one voter ID fraud case there are around 10,000 cases of absentee ballot fraud, yet there is no rallying cry from the right to do anything about absentee ballot fraud. Odd that!

 

American politics is in a very bad shape when politics is so utterly polarised and wild fabrications pass for the truth.

 

Cue, denouncing of my post by another mis-informed incoherent rant.

on Aug 11, 2012

ambisset
Cue, denouncing of my post by another mis-informed incoherent rant.

Nah, not worth the trouble for a bot.  But voter fraud very likely elected Al Franken.  And there is no legitimate argument against making sure votes are legally cast.

on Aug 12, 2012

As a UK citizen it saddens me that the level of American political dialog has on both the left and the right is fast disappearing off any form of reasoned rational argument and instead focused on wild mis-characterisations,

Its always both sides, both sides must be wrong. You can't have someone wrong and someone right... nooo.

 There are many things in the post that are simply wrong mostly WILDLY wrong and even the most biased fact check site would point them out as fantasy land. 

For example the current US supreme court has 5 Justices who are conservative and 4 liberal. NOT 5 liberals and 4 conservatives. The Chief Justice could never seriously be described by any sane and rational individual as an "activist judge".

Actually it has 6 liberal activists and 3 who uphold the rule of law and might be voting republican or democrat.

Kennedy voted to uphold the law and constitution in the case of obamacare, but voted for lawlessness in the case of Arizona.

Your claim that "any fact check site would say there are 5 conservatives and 4 liberal" is balony as based on their voting record and if this is the best example you can come up with of me being wrong then we are in a sad sad state.

private companies can and will design any form of insurance policy they like

You are a liar.

On Voter Fraud, the estimate of voter ID fraud in 2004 was of the order of 0.0004% a vanishingly small problem.

Made up numbers by the people who oppose fraud prevention. The only reason you could possibly oppose to voter ID is if you intend to perpetuate fraud.

Poll taxes are completely different.

The problem is that the US isn't just becoming an economically bad socialist nation. Its becoming a third world country. The democrats are working very hard to undermine lawful voting, a hallmark of petty socialistic third world dictatorships.

We are not becoming britain, we are becoming venuzuela

The president outright refuses to enforce laws and liberal senate supports him, as well as liberal activist judges... the problem is that they are using the "end justifies the means" mentality and the means is the breakdown of the rule of law

that which differentiates countries like canda, england, and australia... from third world ones like mexico and venezuela and cuba

it is the METHOD via which they are achieving their goals that is the most destructive

I could move to canada or britain, same english language, ridiculously high taxes and socialized healthcare.. but at least the law is upheld with integrity

 

Meta
Views
» 433
Comments
» 5
Category
Sponsored Links